On Feb. 2, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit finally decided a lawsuit challenging EPA’s decisions during re-registration for failure to consult under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) about pesticide products containing 31 different active ingredients. Although the Ninth Circuit upheld the District Court’s dismissal of most of the Center for Biological Diversity’s claims, the Ninth Circuit still allowed the case to go forward, potentially for all 31 pesticides. The litigation will continue, and the Environmental Protection Agency may eventually face court deadlines to consult about these and many more pesticides—an outcome that would massively reorder how EPA’s pesticide resources are spent.
Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt selected by President-Elect Donald Trump for nomination to serve as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – Pruitt was elected the Attorney General of Oklahoma in November 2010 and “… established Oklahoma’s first federalism unit to combat unwarranted regulation and overreach by the federal[…]Read More »
As spring planting gave way to summer weed management, what was feared might happen in some locations happened: In-season dicamba-related problems drew regulatory attention and ire. Read moreRead More »